Over 59080
politifake

Iraq Politics


P.T.S.D - Getting home, and realising...... You'll never be this AWESOME AGAIN!


TAGS: iraq afghanistan soldier armi war
Rating: 4.38/5

More politifakes by 440wakeup

RonaldReagan - June 11, 2015, 4:51 pm
Orson Welles once said Hollywood is the world's biggest train set. Same can be said for service. It's a letdown for sure


If Michael Brown, Eric Garner & Trayvon Martin had been killed in Afghanistan -


TAGS: michael brown eric garner trayvon martin obama holder sharpton jesse jackson farrakhan race baiters naacp afghanistan iraq war troops
Rating: 4.97/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Thedge - December 12, 2014, 1:58 pm
Been a couple weeks, probably don't now. Just so the sleep well. 5L


WHO WAS LYING ABOUT IRAQ? - The consensus on which Bush relied was first fully formed in the Clinton admin. This Democratic drumbeat continued and even intensified when Bush succeeded Clinton.


TAGS: iraq war
Rating: 4.79/5

More politifakes by vbattaile

simplegenius - September 24, 2012, 9:01 pm
also, the Sarin gas used against coalition forces and yellow cake and depleted Uranium they found wasn't just lying out in the open.
simplegenius - September 24, 2012, 9:00 pm
Not even sure Bush lied about Iraq.. Hans Blinx was escorted by Saddams closest security and they didn't allow him anywhere important. It's like "no, don't look in this room labeled radioactive or dangerous, or anything"


STOOGES - When they outlive their usefulness, you can resign them or lynch them.




IRAQ - Individual experiences may vary




OBAMA DRONES -




Mullah Obama -


TAGS: obama mullah terrorist isis isil islamist jordan democrats liberals progressives iraq syria middle east
Rating: 4.05/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 22, 2015, 6:30 pm
Never attribute to malice what can be sufficiently explained by incompetence.
MashiMashi - February 7, 2015, 1:20 pm
The rebels you arm today, are the Jihadist you have to kill tomorrow


The Art Of War -


TAGS: war isis iraq president clown
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Greybeard

Greybeard - September 12, 2014, 11:02 pm
Thank you :)
Thegde - September 12, 2014, 12:22 pm
5L


WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRACTION -




HUBRIS - Grabbing credit for bringing combat troops out of Iraq and fulfilling a promise, when all you did was use the withdrawal plan created by President Bush.




WAR - Everyone wants to wage it, but no one wants to see its consequences.




Reminder: Biden Supported Iraq War in 2002 -




LIAR IN CHIEF - IF ELECTED, I will immediately start withdrawing troops from Iraq & Afghanistan, ending those wars in six months




DECEMBER 20, 1983 -




DEMOCRAT NARRATIVE: NOW IRAQ HAS WMD'S -


TAGS: democrat narrative iraq has wmd s
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

Curlyrocks - October 21, 2014, 2:31 pm
of VX or other nerve gas that can last indefinitely. Even if the invasion of Iraq was justified and Saddam was making chem weapons just before it, it doesn't justify Obama's attack. IF ISIS used chem weapons it was pool shock and cleaner in an old shell.
Curlyrocks - October 21, 2014, 2:28 pm
I have no doubt they found dispersal shells Possibly made just before the invasion. The part I question is how the chemicals in the shells lasted more than 10 years. Sarin has a limited shelf life as do most blistering chemicals, and there's no evidence..
foxrecon19d - October 20, 2014, 1:22 pm
Well, cranks. If you and your fellow Democrat propagandists are to be believed, the POTUS in 2005 is the same POTUS in 2014...because, you know. Bush's fault ;-P
crankyhead - October 20, 2014, 12:20 pm
Just for the sake of clarity, who was POTUS in 2005?
foxrecon19d - October 17, 2014, 11:44 pm
Either the Democrat Party or American soldiers are lying, then. I know one thing. When we found the weapons, it wasn't a Republican administration that said, "Forget you ever saw these things..."
Curlyrocks - October 17, 2014, 4:12 pm
I find it questionable. Chemical weapons break down over time. IF chemical weapons were used by ISIS there's no way it was Saddam era chemicals. They may still have the dispersal shells but the chemicals in them are 10+ years old.


COUNTERFACTUALS -




COUNTERFACTUALS -




BARACK OBOMBYA - Nobel Peace Prize Winner




Chris Kyle Day -


TAGS: chris kyle american sniper the legend texas seals military troops veterans iraq
Rating: 4.73/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

premiumgrade - February 5, 2015, 9:12 pm
5 big ones for you. Spoken like a man of considerable common sense. Thumbs Up
Bandit5906 - February 5, 2015, 5:20 pm
10L if it were possible


Leading From Behind -




OBAMA SAYS HE WANTS TO SEND OUR SOLDIERS TO DIE IN SYRIA BECAUSE SYRIA HAS IRAQI WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION? HANG ON! FOR OVER THIRTEEN YEARS, BARACK OBAMA AND HIS DEMOCRAT PARTY TOLD US IRAQ NECVR HAD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! -


TAGS: democrats admit iraq had wmd s
Rating: 4.83/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - July 4, 2013, 9:58 pm
"The rest of us"? You got stuffed animals down there in your mommy's basement? Name your sources of " the rest of us "
foxrecon19d - July 4, 2013, 9:55 pm
Why do you insist on proving me right? Now go find the namsd of those 'heavily armed' soldiers (your words) murdered at FT Hood, Quest Boy.
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:15 pm
Why do you insist on telling me what I do and don't believe? One would think, that by now, you'd be just as tired of your strawmen, as the rest of us are.
foxrecon19d - July 3, 2013, 2:24 pm
Why are you so eager to believe Obama's?
crankyhead - July 3, 2013, 1:14 pm
That's not what I said at all fox, and you know it. Why are you so surprised to find out that politicians lie?
crankyhead - July 3, 2013, 1:13 pm
Why Waldo, would you like to meet an actual soldier someday, instead of just playing with your G.I. Joe's in mommy's basement?
foxrecon19d - July 1, 2013, 6:13 pm
Come on, CRANKYHEAD! Stop making yourself look like an idiot! You said that all of our American soldiers murdered at Ft Hood where "heavily armed". Stop making yourself look like a complete Obama-worshipping idiot and NAME ONE heavily armed soldier.
foxrecon19d - July 1, 2013, 6:08 pm
CRANKYHEAD- Says that he supports all of the lies Barack Obama says because "...he is in politics..."
foxrecon19d - July 1, 2013, 5:05 pm
Lies that you whole heartedly believe., Crankyhead. BTW, how is your quest going to find a "highly armed" soldier killed by your buddy at FT Hood?
crankyhead - July 1, 2013, 2:02 pm
That's quite the leap fox, considering that I never even mentioned Obama. To address your point, the man is in politics, chances are, at some point, he's told a few lies.
OTC - June 30, 2013, 11:51 pm
http://www.nysun.com/foreign/iraqs-wmd-secreted-in-syria-sada-says/26514/
StoneTools - June 30, 2013, 4:50 pm
my, my, my, crankyhead, looks like the old kid with his hand in the cookie jar!
ipaprime - June 30, 2013, 8:37 am
I remember it to cranks
foxrecon19d - June 29, 2013, 8:13 pm
So, you are saying that Barack Obama is a liar. Consider yourself busted.
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 6:29 pm
So, you claim to be the only person who remembers this, and then you choose to only hold liberals accountable for forgetting? That's called a double standard, isn't it?
JGalt - June 29, 2013, 5:47 pm
I seem to be the only one that remembers Colin Powell and perhaps some others saying that during the initial incursion that the WMD's were being moved NW to Syria... Hmmm Liberals have very short memories
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:57 pm
Free lesson for Waldo: You're intentionally excluding a third possibility. That's commonly referred to as the fallacy of false choice. The third and most likely possibility being that Syria makes it's own WMD's. Consider yourself educated.


THE IRAQ WAR - Joe Biden- Hillary Clinton- Harry Reid- John Kerry Plus 104 other Democrats voted for it in 2002.


TAGS: iraq
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by TWOEDGE



FALSE PROPHETS -




WAR - "All warfare is based on deception." ~Sun Tzu




Draft Dodging losers like Bush and Cheney should be nowhere near a war room. -


TAGS: iraq war bush draft dodger
Rating: 2.58/5

More politifakes by animalmother

Zeitguy - July 10, 2014, 12:02 am
This was a great poster; 10 years ago.


IRAQ - let the civil war begin




Just "A Little Ride," Donald Trump? -


TAGS: donald trump ieds little ride veterans wounded warriors elitist billionaire rino gop hack republican loser rnc clown jr salzman iraq hero
Rating: 3.83/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Curlyrocks - February 3, 2016, 11:26 am
I despise the fool Trump, but he has done a lot more for veterans than most other candidates of either party.
Bandit5906 - February 2, 2016, 9:00 pm
At least Trump didn't demand a legless vet stand up! And demand it more than once!


'BYE AMERICANS! -




OIL ADDICTION - Don't you love it when the biggest petro dealer in town says you got a problem.




DEMOCRATS SAY, "NOW THERE ARE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ!" -




Just Add Water -




Skating On Thin Ice -




OBAMA'S IRAQ STRATEGY -




My Brothers Keeper -




The Firemens Ball -




Another Roll Of The Dice -




SURGE A TEMPORARY FIX - the wolves have returned




The Taliban They Left Behind -




Mission Un-accomplished -


TAGS: iraq isis army military failure
Rating: 4.86/5

More politifakes by Greybeard

Greybeard - August 18, 2014, 2:47 am
They may be to busy protesting against Israel for protecting itself...


IRAQ WAR JOURNAL -




Iraq -


TAGS: war iraq terrorism oil bush
Rating: 4.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - July 1, 2014, 7:28 am
"its what liberals do," I take it you learned a new phrase and you're practicing with it? Because otherwise, I'd say you were being either a hypocrite or just stupid, Mr. Logician.
JGalt - June 19, 2014, 12:38 am
the statement about libertarians always being wrong is an argumentum ad hominem, when you can't argue facts, you discredit the person in entirety.... its what liberals do,
Cannabal - June 15, 2014, 12:51 am
Incidentally, your a**ertion is a complete nonsequitur, or was that directed at fox?
JGalt - June 14, 2014, 11:43 pm
argumentum ad hominem. Invalid. Thanks for playing.
JGalt - June 14, 2014, 11:41 pm
ooh can we turn this into a 3,000 long line of replies in the line of Cranky and Ft Hood armed soldiers? Hmmm
JGalt - June 14, 2014, 11:40 pm
easy to say when you redefine terrorism as workplace violence!
JGalt - June 14, 2014, 11:39 pm
in his dreams... just like President peanut- appease terrorists, problem solved... yeah right
EmmaRoydes - June 14, 2014, 8:45 am
That would hold true about almost any war. The war in Afghanistan was probably the only war we've waged in the last 100 years that was necessary. And we are about to tuck tail and run. Then we wait for the next 9/11
EmmaRoydes - June 14, 2014, 8:40 am
How was Iraq not a legally waged war? Congress authorized it, the president waged it. That's legal according to the constitution. It was an unnecessary war, but not illegal.
Cannabal - June 14, 2014, 2:54 am
Huh? Why would I vote Democrat in 2014?
Cannabal - June 14, 2014, 2:52 am
Considering you're a Libertarian, yes, you're wrong about pretty much everything, but that's not my point. I'm here to balance out the armchair propaganda people see on this site. I mean, you don't wanna leave anyone out.
Zeitguy - June 14, 2014, 2:25 am
Absolutely, Young men dying for old elitist interests is criminal and unacceptable.
foxrecon19d - June 14, 2014, 1:40 am
Cannabal, buddy. Getting defensive over supporting the very same president that allowed this situation to occur does not does not sound like :Vote Democrat in 2014!
foxrecon19d - June 14, 2014, 1:35 am
In 2001, neither Republican or Democrat worried about the cost. That came later, after the military won all the battles. And, ultimately, it is the military who are paying the price for successfully enforcing the wishes of our civilian masters
Zeitguy - June 14, 2014, 1:29 am
Pointing fingers across the aisle is like blaming your sister for your father blowing the rent money on your crazy uncle's get rich scheme.
Zeitguy - June 14, 2014, 1:08 am
Our sons and daughters were sacrificed for this dispute. It was not a legally waged war. Was it worth it? What was our intentions and exit strategy? I am old enough to remember the nightly news body count of the Vietnam war. Thought we had learned.
Curlyrocks - June 13, 2014, 8:27 pm
I can be, I just kinda figured with you almost never bad mouthing the guy or harping on his failures and hating on Republicans for starting the programs he ends up continuing you where a big fan, was I wrong?
Cannabal - June 13, 2014, 5:57 pm
"My boy Obama?" You can be a real presumptious t'wat sometimes.
Cannabal - June 13, 2014, 5:56 pm
Well, there wasn't before the invasion in March 2003, but afterwards, there was and most certainly now is.
Cannabal - June 13, 2014, 5:55 pm
That doesn't change the fact that the administration flagrantly lied about it.
OTC - June 13, 2014, 5:49 pm
Fox, you mean democrats were for the war before they were against it? I never heard that one before.
Curlyrocks - June 13, 2014, 4:11 pm
Good thing this site never takes down old posters, I'm going to need this now that your boy Obama wants to rekindle the Iraq war. Although I do agree with the poster. All the money spent and lives lost just to give Al-Quada a new strong hold.
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 2:26 pm
Cannabal' Then according to your logic, there was never an insurgent, extremist, Islamic terrorist organization operatinv in Iraq. Therefore, because there was never an Iraqi insurgency, all of our folks are really alive! Send them a birthday!
EmmaRoydes - June 13, 2014, 2:17 pm
d*** it, Bush should have used hashtag diplomacy. It worked so well for the liberals in getting the girls freed from boko haram. Oh, wait ...
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 2:17 pm
Cannabal- Your poster is about the money wasted in Iraq. That's cool. My point is that we lost thousands of American lives due to the Democrat's decision to send us there then turn against us
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 2:13 pm
Cannabal- Bush never said he defeated terrorism. That was Obama. And mind this. No American soldier would ever have been deployed without the support of the Democra t Party... then they opposed it.
Cannabal - June 13, 2014, 1:50 pm
I won't disagree with you on that, Fox, except for the "hearts of the American people," because the Iraq War was bullsh'it from the start, and absolutely NO ONE has taken responsibility for it, and now we are reaping the seeds of war that were sewn.
Cannabal - June 13, 2014, 1:48 pm
No, Bush ended terrorism, he had a whole banner and everything.
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 1:25 pm
Thousands of our brothers and sisters killed, and yet our politicians still fo not realize that good intentions and stark reality are mortal enemies
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 1:23 pm
Read about the last six months of Amerca's involvement in Vietnam. You will then know what America will do in Iraq. An air strike to save face, the demand that Iraq take responsibility for itself, then America tucks tail and runs.
foxrecon19d - June 13, 2014, 1:19 pm
As we have seen in Vietnam, the war was not lost on the battlefield. The United States military did its job. This war, if lost, was lost in the halls of Congress and in the hearts of the American people
OTC - June 13, 2014, 12:29 pm
Nothing to fear, Obama ended terrorism


JACKASS -




PACK YOUR BAGS, LADS! BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THE WORLD, JUST ORDERED YOUR PRESIDENT TO SEND YOU TO FIGHT IN HIS NEW WAR IN IRAQ...CHEERS! -




OBAMA'S GRAND STRATEGY ON IRAQ -


TAGS: obama s grand strategy on iraq
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - September 17, 2014, 12:27 pm
Actually had a college puke tell me that. The Republicans purposely LOST the election TWICE so that they could execute a secret plan hatched up by George Bush to make Obama, a black man, look stupid. It was a class that was taught in political science
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 11:27 am
I think the real culprit in this whole thing is ... wait for it ... Bush! Yeah, that's the trick, Bush did it. I wasn't aware he was savvy enough to do all this, but, think about it. He started another war. The bastid.
foxrecon19d - September 17, 2014, 11:01 am
"Uh, thenk yu. Thenk yu' ver' much. Now fer' ma' next number.. You aina' nuthin' but a hound dog! A rockin' alla' time!"
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:27 am
Kind of like a crappy, low budget imitation of a Monty Python skit.
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:19 am
and you had ring-side seats for the shouting match. It was ad- and sugar-free, low caffeine and low calorie. Kind of like a diet delight or lightweight version of a b****-slap fight. You have to admit it would have made a good youtube video.
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:15 am
You have to excuse TA, once he gets into attack mode, it's really hard for him to stop baring his fangs.
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:10 am
but that shows you just how awesome it really is. Loved by all, no negative comments on it. You should be proud that it was so well received.
foxrecon19d - September 17, 2014, 12:23 am
C'mon, guys. I know this poster is awesome and all. But the thing says "211 more comments...." That's just weird.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 10:16 pm

You know you can't talk like that here. Also, I don't care what you fellas do on other sites and I won't be bullied into taking sides on this issue. Walk away gentlemen.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 10:14 pm

I got all of the information in my posts from the comment thread, I haven't received a PM from Emma in months. Maybe I can't tell you what a man of science would do but I can tell you what a Man would do and it isn't "wish someone would die in a fire"...
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:48 pm
Where's the apology to me for accusing me or for you and TA calling me a liar?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:46 pm
respect for.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:46 pm
opinion, it was either TA or one of his attack kitties that did it. Think copycat and flattery and old sayings. That's why, unlike TA, I don't take this **** seriously at all. But I don't like being called a f***tard or f***wit by someone who I have no
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:44 pm
That's the problem for you two, I'm not concerned about it, I merely brought it up to show how immature you guys are. If you notice, I didn't make threats, I didn't call either of you any names (other than clowns), I merely posted the fact that, in my
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:42 pm
If you want to talk about coincidences, try looking at when ta attacked me for the snail poster, then go to the other site and see when the emmaroydes account was created.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:40 pm
if you want peace, i'm for it. but you should at least come half way and extend the olive branch for your part in this. at least apologize to Terror for making a false accusation against us and withdraw it.We didn't impersonate you on the web.Take it easy
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:38 pm
if you really were worried about being impersonated elsewhere, you could've maturely complained about it in private. But then you wouldn’t have been able to use it as a personal attack against TA. that's where I think you slipped up. you're full of it
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:38 pm
to me it looks like YOU clearly wanted TA to publicly see all of this because you know once he saw that phony TA acct it would p-iss him off.That phony TA acct mysteriously went up ONLY a short while BEFORE you posted about it here. also a coincidence?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:37 pm
u couldn't resist rubbing it AGAIN that TA was corrected by a MOD in your post to 0TC. then to pour salt in the wound you just so happen to accuse TA of impersonating you in the same string of attacks to conveniently make your case against us.Coincidence?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:37 pm
if peace is what you want, then mocking TA or rubbing it in when an admin corrects him isn't the way to do it. bear in mind, he and I are good friends but I'm my own man. I can be friends with you. but here is the problem I see with all of this:
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:34 pm
can forget about any cooperation from them in resolving this, as TA seems to think it is, "Internet destroying crisis"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:32 pm
Yeah, I thought weasel sounded a little better. Would you prefer ferret? What exactly is "my other site"? I just went to the site to see if there were any other developments and, from the sounds of things, they think this site is a joke. So I think you
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:20 pm
as chupacabra said earlier, neither of us owns a patent on the name we use here, so just laugh it off, move on, and be the azzhole that we all know you are.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:17 pm
Im a weasel now? I'm special kind of X-man mutant: Animorphman. A friendly heads up...it appears the phony TA account was banned on your other site along with the others. why am I not surprised? TA's real acct there is the only one I believe was REAL
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:17 pm
The seriousness? hahahaha, to you, it must the equivalent of a full scale a**ault on sydney by ISIS.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:15 pm
I'm sorry, I'm a little hard of hearing, can you shout just a little bit louder? I don't want to miss any of your ranting and blather, because you're so cute when you're mad.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:12 pm
nah, curly, it's more fun to watch terror act like an internet bully. Kick sand in his face every so often and watch him get pissed off and maybe, just maybe, he'll bring some more attack weasels onto the site.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 8:02 pm
i CLEARLY STATED that we've asked the science forum admins for the IP address used to access the "emmaroydes" account on that site, LEARN TO f***ING READ.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 7:58 pm
why are you trying to downplay the seriousness of this? oh, right, because i just told you that you're gonna get caught.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 7:56 pm
vik was a mental patient who spammed this site to the point of suppressing other user contributions... but as far as i know, he never impersonated someone else on another website.
Curlyrocks - September 16, 2014, 7:48 pm
I'm going to accuse Vik of all this stalking nonsense. He spent years making this site intolerable only to get the boot, now you guys are doing it for him. NO ONE PLAY OFF THIS COMMENT TO ACCUSE SOME ONE ELSE OF BEING VIK!
Curlyrocks - September 16, 2014, 7:42 pm
Come on people, can't we use the internet to stalk celebrities and our Ex's like normal weirdos, do we half to stalk nobodies on the other side of the earth?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 7:36 pm
I would hope that you would do the same thing for the emmaroydes account, but then, you wouldn't want fingers pointed at either you or your attack weasel
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 7:34 pm
Then again, I find it hilarious that you clowns thought it was funny when it was just me being abused, when it turned out someone did it to you, all of a sudden, you stiffs get pissed off. freaking hypocrites.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 7:31 pm
By the same token, the account that was created using EmmaRoydes was done the night that TA attacked me for the poster that mysteriously was posted on the science blog site. As you say, TA doesn't own that name any more than I own emmaroydes. CASE CLOSED
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 6:41 pm
we're gonna get the IP addresses of the "emmaroydes" account and the "terroraustralis" account from that site, and we're gonna ask motinet to compare them to the IP addresses of EVERY politifake member. we're gonna prove once and for all who did this.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 5:33 pm
the only person ON THIS FORUM who is desperately trying to convince everyone that TA or I are going around the web IMPERSONATING you is YOU.Clearly you want people to believe this:THAT'S YOUR AGENDA.And I dont see you recanting your accusation.CASE CLOSED
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 5:16 pm
I have no reason to trash fauxnews to begin with, he voluntarily left the site a few weeks ago.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 5:10 pm
Defending my honor? whoever created the TA account also trashed me and you along with fauxnews by claiming it was a single person who was a known internet troll. How would that be defending me?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:50 pm
the day after your big argument with TA someone creates a phony TA acct on that site defending the honor of EmmaRoydes and accusing ME by name of impersonating you all the web. you expect us to believe TA created that? he's my friend. what a liar
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:49 pm
When i saw it in google search, my poster on snails was miraculously used on that account. Not very likely a coincidence. I'm sure that TA has many enemies on the web or someone who is trying to feed the arguments between us.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:46 pm
Plus, I don't think either of you has the balls to admit to doing it.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:46 pm
you also dont have a patent on the name EmmaRoydes. U admit that's NOT your real name.That you're so quick to accuse TA is what's suspicious.You could have many enemies on the web.It could be any one of'em.Why TA?Unless that's your plan, to discredit him
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:44 pm
I didn't do it, but one of the two of you must be the ones responsible for trashing me on that site. It fits your MO almost perfectly. Funny how you get mad about someone doing it to you, but think it's funny that someone did it to me.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:41 pm
until now, no one has mentioned IMPERSONATING anyone. Only you. You would think if TA or I were doing that to you, we would've brought it to your attention by now. Only you brought this up, the same day the fake TA account went up on that forum.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:38 pm
that's very clever, Emma. using other accounts on the web elsewhere to tarnish TA here. The fact you publicly exploit it here when you could've brought it up in private like a normal person makes it clear you are just doing this to be disruptive.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:35 pm
why "attack dog?" why not a more glorious animal like a falcon or a tiger? If it makes you feel better, neither TA nor I were impersonating you on ANY site. In fact,your public outburst here makes me wonder if it was really just you this entire time
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:33 pm
hahahahaha, "a friend of mine just showed me that site" - right, but it wasn't you that did it, right? hahahahaha, nobody will buy that crap, you manipulating, useleless little crybaby. Odd how you can dish it out, but god forbid anyone stand up to you.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:30 pm
funny that you should call me dog meat after you sic'ed your attack dogs on me. All I have to say to that is "Woof!"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:28 pm
disagree with you?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:27 pm
oh, now it's a month, last night you were claiming two weeks, now you stretch it out to a month? What's next? Tomorrow are you going to claim it's been a couple of years since you tried to wean yourself off of calling people f***tard who, gasp, dared to
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:26 pm
You did more than 3 weeks of flooding the site with F***tard and f***wit name calling of me and others here. So stop crying
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:23 pm
I don't private message moooo or anyone else here, so try blowing smoke up someone else's skirt loser.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:23 pm
and in response to your threat, all I have to say to you is "waaaaaahhhhhh!"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:21 pm
but, whoever did it, I think it's cool that they were able to get you to wad up your panties again.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:21 pm
I've never impersonated you anywhere. I have too much self-respect to do that.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:10 pm
you are dog meat. i dont know how, but you're gonna pay for this. i swear on my life, you will f***ing pay.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:10 pm
http://www.thescienceforum.com/politics/46159-climate-change-debunked-liberal-hoax.html#post591959
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:07 pm
funny, because a friend of mine just showed me that site, and YOU'VE BEEN IMPERSONATING ME, YOU f***ING SACK OF ****. HOW f***ING DARE YOU, YOU MANIPULATIVE ****, I HOPE YOU f***ING DIE IN A FIRE.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:02 pm
emma didnt tell anyone they're wrong, she said they are LIARS. theres a VERY f***ING BIG DIFFERENCE.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:57 pm
dont f***ing tell me what "a man of science" would or wouldn't do, YOU ARENT ONE, you have nothing to base this a**umption on.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:55 pm
so three weeks of flooding the site with troll posters is okay, because the troll got called a f***tard?
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:54 pm
emma ADMITTED to TROLLING, which last i checked was AGAINST THE RULES. but she gets away with it because i called her a f***tard a month ago?
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:52 pm
maybe you should read the f***ing comment thread rather than basing your judgement on what emma has told you in private messages?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:34 pm
so, that shows you the childishness that I have to deal with when it comes to these clowns.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:32 pm
Those are the only two that i've discovered so far.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:32 pm
They also went to a liberal forum and created the same account, but didn't post anything there yet.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:31 pm
It gets better than that mooo, either TA or one of his attack dogs went to a science blog, created an account as emmaroydes, uploaded my poster, and started attacking the members on the site.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:18 am

You're a young man, many people are going to disagree with you during your lifetime. You need to learn how to handle that more rationally and calmly.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:17 am

....which simply isn't true. A man of science is adult enough to ignore those who disagree with him and would rarely resort to name calling in response. Honestly, I'd say you brought this war on yourself by expecting far too much from your opponent.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:14 am

You admit to calling her names which just encourages retaliation and then you enlist your friends to come here and back you up. Also, you stated that telling a scientist that his science is wrong is akin to punching his child in the face.....
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:11 am

I don't know TA, you say you hate Emma because you "told her that denialists help the leftist agenda" and she refused to listen. It's her right not to listen, no one here can be forced to agree with you.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:57 am
You have a wonderful day (or night, whatever) I have to call it quits. Been real fun watching you step on your appendages.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:54 am
and that wasn't me, but you and foxrecon that used that argument.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:53 am
Your argument is the equivalent of Hitler saying that Stalin deserved to be invaded.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:52 am
besides, the ones who share your disgust happen to be attack dogs that you enlisted. Kind of invalidates your "point" now doesn't it?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:51 am
Like I said, you should go back and read comment threads before you claim to be above it all.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:48 am
but you're stupid enough to argue... nay, TROLL, FOR OVER THREE WEEKS, multiple people who share your disgust at how leftists abuse the global warming debate to further their own agenda?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:47 am
you might want to go back and read your comments before you claim sainthood.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:46 am
nah, you're the one that responds to "here's what I think" by saying "you F***ING F***TARD, how dare you impune something that I claim to be?"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:45 am
my mistake, her posting was on August 15 and you posted a response on September 15. See, I admit when I'm wrong, unlike others.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:45 am
you're the slapper. i'm the guy who's been saying "OI, STOP PISSING ON THE CARPET, MUTT"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:43 am
enough to argue with a mod.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:43 am
The problem that you are unable to see is that she came on like gang busters and attacked me repeatedly, mooo asked her to at least wait a while before posting like that, she became belligerent with him and the rest is history. I've never been stupid
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 1:43 am
you said "She just posted something in the forum". As in Julie? As I was leaving I just posted an Obama picture about SOAP to add to my collection. But I don't see Julie. Lose your mind again? Check the lost and found
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:41 am
works both ways, now doesn't it? Of course, you can't see that can you? Oh, you poor little lost soul, "Emma is so mean and all I did was act civil. Why does emma treat me like that? waaaaah, oops I think I just wet my pants again"
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:40 am
i was telling her the same thing i've been telling cthulu lately, "you need to back off, because emma WILL provoke you into saying something stupid and moo WILL ban you for it".
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:38 am
well, i havent slapped many dogs, but it doesnt take a genius to figure out that if you do it, the dog is probably gonna try and bite you.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:38 am
so, if anyone is to blame for her getting banned it would be either her or you since she's one of your disciples and you must have taught her well.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:36 am
and she just posted something in the forums, so it couldn't have made her bleed out or anything.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
Julie33 wasn't banned because of me, she was banned because she went after a mod using your tactics.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
exactly, as i said, the person who asked me to come and refute your bull**** lies is now banned.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
and then say "huh, he must be a troll because he didn't kiss my a** when I yelled F***TARD!"
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
i was asked to come and help refute your bull**** lies, and the person who asked is now banned. everyone else involved is involved because you personally attacked their profession.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:33 am
No, it's more like I post something and, instead of refuting it, you and your dogs start snarling, nipping, and biting. Your ego wouldn't let you just say something like "no, that's incorrect because ..." instead of "you f***ing f***tard"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:31 am
because you can look at julie33's posting #70354 to see that she is the one that admitted to it.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:31 am
and by "fight back" you mean "post lies that will aggravate people and provoke them into responding"? thats like getting attacked by your neighbor's dog, and deciding to fight back by wearing a suit made of steaks. do you realise how dumb that is?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:28 am
Oh, are you denying that you called me those names? Or are you denying that you enlisted attack dogs?
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:28 am
while i use my words to refute your accusations that i am trolling, YOU use your words to take cheap sh**s at me. thanks for proving my point.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:27 am
that's the absolute truth. But what you don't have a right to do is to call me f***tard or f***wit because you don't agree with me. And when your attack dogs go after me, I have the right to fight back.


GRIEF -




" IRAQ : “NO, NO TO OCCUPATION. ” - Obama: " If we work hard, Afghanistan could be a success…like Iraq!"




THE IRAQ WAR - Libs constantly said it was Bush's"Blood for Oil!" Then where are my cheap gas prices, you dumbasses!




'OPERATION NEW DAWN' - I'm an Army Dog. I'm blinded by the changes in Iraq.




2 LIBERAL LIES REVEALED - 1. That President Bush was acting as a lone cowboy in Iraq. 2. That President Obama was unlike his predecessor by building a robust coalition to invade Libya.




DEMOCRATS - PELOSI SUPPORT -




ANTI-WAR LIBERALS - The more you keep your head buried in the sand, the longer you leave your ass exposed to attack.


TAGS: democrats obama congress war iraq islamic extremists
Rating: 3.72/5

More politifakes by WTFO

WTFO - January 10, 2013, 12:32 am
However, if you are referring to Libya, then you are correct. Pres Obama failed to get Congressional approval. Even the NY Times agrees: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/opinion/21Ackerman.html?_r=0
WTFO - January 10, 2013, 12:30 am
Okay. A comment on a really old poster but...I'm a**uming you're referring to Iraq. If that's the case, then you are incorrect since Pres Bush received authorization from Congress in Oct 02 to attack Iraq.
Rudedog - January 9, 2013, 9:38 pm
You're more exposed to attack when you non constitutionally invade their countries


I got a present for you I.S.I.S. -




Get with the program. -




IRAQ - It's true. I've been anointed by God himself to defeat Saddam Hussein. And you can't go against God.




HEY REPUBLICANS - Already forgotten who REALLY squandered taxpayer-dollars?




HEY OBAMA - Deploy these unmanned vehicles to Iraq And let the fun begin




SEQUESTRATION - It's not a spending cut: in comparison to past expenditures, it's barely a spending scratch!




DEMOCRATS - REID SUPPORT -




SPREADING DEMOCRACY -




CURVEBALL - You can thank Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi for why the WMD claims were a complete NO-HITTER.




WMDS - Hell, if Google couldn't find them, then no one can.




WAR WITH IRAN - Healthcare? Too damn expensive. Bombs? Oh, man, they're dirt cheap.




We lost the war against Iraq like cowards. Let's win the war against poverty like heroes. -




NON-UNIFORMED ENEMY COMBATANTS -




NEOCONSERVATIVE LOGIC OF TERRORISM - Terrorists can hide. Countries can't. (Invasion explained.)




"THE WAR IS MAKING YOU POOR" - "[I]f the campaign is protracted, the resources of the State will not be equal to the strain." ~Sun Tzu




DIPLOMACY - GO BACK HOME, INFIDEL!




IN AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE -




MILITARY LEADERSHIP - "I can only account for his numerous mistakes upon the hypothesis that he is crazy." - General William B Franklin (Bruce Catton, 'Glory Road')




OUR KIDS - SEND OUR KIDS TO COLLEGE, NOT IRAQ!




When it comes to foreign policy -




REMEMBER THE CRIMINALS - And the number of Americans who died because of them




Want to know how to lose a winnable war in Iraq? Watch and learn...from the Tea party and Obama. -


TAGS: geico isis iraqi war
Rating: 2.21/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 10:03 am
oops, I meant trash anything
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 9:44 am
I always find it funny when people attempt to trash the tea party by using quotes from liberal sources.
Zeitguy - September 14, 2014, 10:52 pm
Meh


TWITTER - What revolutions are made of. @WORLD WTF?




SYRIA - Oh, of course, we couldn't find those WMDs: Saddam sent them all to Syria!




FOREIGN POLICY DISASTER - And what do we have to show for it?


TAGS: iraq
Rating: 2.14/5

More politifakes by PapaFox



Watch and learn, 'Murica: how to lose a war. Let the American Tea Party lead the way. -


TAGS: iraq war tea party isis
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by CthulthuDownUnder

EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 12:11 am
It also means that the fundamental beliefs and intents of the founders are guides to Americanism.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 12:09 am
ing the USA includes those who are incarcerated. It doesn't mean that ALL Americans are incarcerated.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 12:08 am
The statement: "The Tea Party includes those who possess a strong belief in the foundational Judeo-Christian values embedded in our great founding documents" instills the mistaken belief that the tea party is a fundie organization. It's equivalent to say
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 12:00 am
libertarians are essentially the same thing. It's all about constitution and especially government by and for the people.
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 11:58 pm
I can see that you know nothing about the tea party and what it actually stands for. Rule out the fringe (like you should do with any political organization) and see what they really are all about. You will be surprised to see that the tea party and
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 11:56 pm
You are absolutely right about the RINOS, but that's not the tea party, that's just idiots that claim to be republicans that are controlled by big business and self-interests rather than the will of the people who put them in office.
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 11:55 pm
and 5th amendments? The tea party believes in adhering to the constitution which includes all of the amendments. Your problem is that you are a**ociating the fringe with the rest of the tea party.
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 11:54 pm
Wrong answer. The tea party believes in smaller government which translates to less taxes. If you add in a fair tax, the IRS gets abolished and tax payers get to keep their entire paychecks. What makes you think the tea party doesn't care about the 4th
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 11:26 pm
its like RINOS calling themselves republicans, "republican in name only" politicians should not be allowed to call themselves republicans.
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 11:14 pm
anarcho capitalists oppose taxes, but they dont give a f*** about the 4th and 5th ammendments to the constitution. THAT is only one of the things that seperate them from libertarians. the tea party should STOP calling themselves what they arent.
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 11:13 pm
without taxes they'd just be borrowing the money, they love borrowing money. hence why the US federal government is 16 trillion dollars in debt.
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 2:12 pm
without bringing individual people like bachman or fundamentalists into the discussion. Neither of those defines what the tea party is.
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 2:08 pm
which leads to the question: What part of the tea party do you find offensive or not legitimate?
EmmaRoydes - September 15, 2014, 2:07 pm
which, of course, is the original intent and core of the tea party movement. The hijacking of the movement doesn't make the core any less legitimate.
Curlyrocks - September 15, 2014, 1:51 pm
Taxes are always an issue worth discussing. It's how the government legitimizes weaking us and making its self stronger. Without taxes they woulden't have the strenght to attack the constitution.
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 10:44 am
its like being held hostage by terrorists and complaining to them about the weather while they hit you. the tea party is a sick joke intended to repulse ordinary people away from libertarianism.
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 10:40 am
no, just the scumbag f***tard movement filled with anarcho-capitalists known as the tea party. no true libertarians b**** about taxes in a time when the first, second, fourth and fifth ammendments to the constitution are on the government's kill list.
JGalt - September 15, 2014, 6:26 am
so now that we've established that a movement has been hijacked, and conned, (which I already recognized very quickly) you still condemn the ideals of liberty, freedom and small government as bad?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 15, 2014, 1:31 am
it might not take a"genius."but what kills me is all the IDIOTS out there that don't think $$$ from lobbyists and special interests groups play a roll. So much for campaign finance reform. Check this out, Terror: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLfFKJFV0Yc
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 1:18 am
easy now, we're all friends here. and it doesnt take a genius to notice that the tea party is funded by aforementioned "corporate military elites"
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 1:02 am
you think we had any choice in the matter? our democracy is just as false as yours, our people have no real power, just like how your people have no power. we're all slaves to the whims of f***head politicians and their "think of the children!" mentality.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 14, 2014, 11:12 pm
Aye,"corporate military elitists",eh? Should I show you the wealth of public records showing you WHAT faction of the Republican party they quietly funded for the 2010 take over of your Congress? Rhymes with p e e. Enough laughs for one night. Take it easy
CthulthuDownUnder - September 14, 2014, 11:05 pm
You can blame Palin and the neo-cons for your misinformation. They co-opted the Teabaggers and whatever libertarian values they stood for was replaced by their agenda. The Neo-cons are very much to blame for the failure of war in Iraq.Read "Tea-O-Conned"
CthulthuDownUnder - September 14, 2014, 10:55 pm
Tea Party ideals? I spit out my "tea" over that one.You're a funny man: (factoid)Even w/population proportionally weighed, the gun death rate is under 1/100,000 – less than one-tenth the US rate. On gun homicide rates, the US outstrips Australia 30-fold
Zeitguy - September 14, 2014, 10:46 pm
You may want to direct you ire towards the corporate military elitists.
Zeitguy - September 14, 2014, 10:39 pm
BTW the tea party had nothing to do with any wars in Iraq.
Zeitguy - September 14, 2014, 10:38 pm
How's that whole "turn in your guns to the government" working for ya down under? Maybe you could have benefited from some Tea Party ideals.


THIS TWEET - Priceless!




IF YOU HEAR VOICES IN YOUR HEAD - You're considered schizophrenic, but if that voice happens to be God you're considered a Republican politician.




S E R I A L M U R D E R E R S - OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION


TAGS: bush iraq murderer cabinet
Rating: 1.67/5

More politifakes by Embalmer

Embalmer - October 12, 2012, 10:22 pm
Is that all you've got??? LMAO.
Embalmer - October 12, 2012, 10:21 pm
They didn't lie to the American people OR Congress so they could kill 5000 troops. Nice try - but it sucked.
GrouchoMarxist - October 12, 2012, 9:27 pm
You're really cute
thatmfguy - October 12, 2012, 7:49 pm
Just curious...is Obama and his gang to be considered the same, as they have been drone bombing the crap out of the Middle East?


IRAQ WAS WORTH IT? - American Deaths at 4424, wounded 31951 Iraqi deaths 98,170 – 107,152 with price tag of about $1 trillion and climbing.


TAGS: iraq
Rating: 1.17/5

More politifakes by Jrock



So, yeah, blame the black 'man.' -




Liberals: Delicate Snowflakes -




ISIS & Boko Haram -




R.I.P. Lance Cpl. Sean P. Neal -




FLASHBACK: Joe Biden On Iraq In 2010 -




Obama's 'Successful' ISIS Strategy -




Twistedly Tone-Deaf Indiscretion -




Stupid Things Liberals Say -




Stupid Things Liberals Say -




Obama Supports ISIS -




Who's The Warmonger Now??? -




Hillary's Legacy of Failed Foreign Policy -




Commander-In-Chief vs. Community Organizer -




Obama & Erdogan Seek To Advance The Islamic Caliphate -




Hateful Things Liberals Say -




DATA THAT THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS USING IS FROM 2004 -


TAGS: iraq wmd cia 2004 report
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - October 21, 2014, 12:00 am
Ahhh... how soon you forget. Obama pulled us out of Iraq in 2011 because "he ended the war", remember? This is a whole new war, unless Obama lied...The Democrat spin doctors are going silly over this one
Cannabal - October 20, 2014, 9:24 pm
Don't mean continuing it?
Cannabal - October 20, 2014, 9:24 pm
Don't mean continuing it?
EmmaRoydes - October 20, 2014, 5:45 pm
He is still starting it
Cannabal - October 20, 2014, 5:20 pm
Bush started it. Twice.
Curlyrocks - October 20, 2014, 3:17 pm
5L, perfect poster.


Barry's Feckless Foreign Policy -




Idiot-In-Chief -




Lyin' Brian -




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE